Nearly two dozen states and the District of Columbia have joined the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in a major lawsuit against Uber. The complaint alleges that Uber charged customers for its Uber One subscription without proper consent, billed users before free trials ended, and provided misleading claims about potential savings. Reports indicate that canceling the subscription required navigating up to 23 screens and completing 32 steps, frustrating many customers.
The lawsuit now includes Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Officials say the amended complaint seeks civil penalties for violations of the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act and various state laws, highlighting the widespread nature of the alleged consumer harm.
According to the lawsuit, Uber allegedly billed customers without explicit permission, often before free trials expired. The complaint emphasizes the difficulty of canceling Uber One subscriptions, describing a process so cumbersome that some users reportedly gave up entirely. The states argue that these practices violate consumer protection laws and undermine shopper confidence across the country.
Uber has consistently denied the FTC’s claims, stating that subscription cancellations are now straightforward. A company spokesperson told The Verge, “Cancellations can now be done anytime in-app and take most people 20 seconds or less.” Despite these assurances, regulators maintain that past practices caused significant consumer harm and merit accountability.
The amended lawsuit specifically requests civil penalties under both federal and state law. Legal experts say the case could set a precedent for how subscription services manage billing transparency and cancellation procedures. If successful, it could influence practices not only for Uber but across the broader ride-sharing and subscription-based services industry.
For Uber customers, this lawsuit underscores the risks of auto-renewing subscriptions. Misleading offers and difficult cancellation processes are increasingly common in tech services, and regulators are signaling that such practices will face scrutiny. Consumer advocates stress the importance of reading terms carefully and monitoring accounts for unauthorized charges.
The Uber case is part of a growing trend of multi-state actions targeting tech companies for consumer protection violations. Analysts suggest that the outcome could push platforms to simplify subscription management and improve transparency. For consumers, this could lead to a more straightforward digital experience and stronger safeguards against hidden fees.
The lawsuit is now moving through federal courts, with each participating state supporting the FTC’s claims. Legal observers expect Uber to continue challenging the allegations while states push for accountability. The case could take months or even years to resolve, potentially reshaping how subscription services operate in the U.S.
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐, ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐.
From jobs and gigs to communities, events, and real conversations โ we bring people and ideas together in one simple, meaningful space.
Comments