Is Neurodiversity at Work Working? The Short Answer Is: Not Yet.
Neurodiversity at work has grown fast. In the last ten years, it went from a little-known idea to a top priority for HR teams. But is neurodiversity at work actually working? The honest answer is: not as well as it should. In the UK, one of the leading countries for workplace neurodiversity, three red flags show that inclusion efforts are breaking down. Let's look at what's going wrong and how to fix it.
Red Flag #1: Adversarial Employee Relations
More and more, disagreements about neurodiversity are ending up in court. Disability discrimination cases sent to the UK's free conciliation service, ACAS, have jumped more than 40% in one year. Neurodiversity-related tribunal cases have almost doubled since 2020. Why? Because employers and employees see the same problem differently:
- Employers often see a performance, attendance, or conduct issue.
- Employees see a failure to recognize their disability and provide reasonable adjustments.
Once that gap appears, trust breaks down. Managers stop listening. Employees feel unheard. The result? Legal escalation. This is a clear sign that workplace neurodiversity inclusion is not working.
Red Flag #2: Poor Quality Advice to Employers
Workplace needs assessments are supposed to guide employers on reasonable adjustments. But many are now just templates filled out by untrained staff. Instead of personalized, evidence-based advice, businesses get tick-box lists of “standard adjustments.” Examples include:
- A security guard told to “work from home once a week.” (Not possible in a safety-critical role.)
- The vague instruction: “Manager must give clear instructions.” (As if managers give unclear instructions on purpose.)
These generic tips don't help. They ignore the real issue: communication style clashes. A good coach or assessor digs deeper to find the root cause. A bad one just hands out meaningless advice.
Red Flag #3: Everyone Is on the Drama Triangle
The Drama Triangle is a sign of toxic relationships. It has three roles: victim, persecutor, and rescuer. In neurodiversity at work, the common assumption is:
- Neurodivergent employee = victim
- Manager = persecutor
- Inclusion program = rescuer
But today, that dynamic has flipped. Many managers and HR professionals feel like victims. They are exhausted from doing extra work, walking on eggshells, and explaining to other staff why one employee can skip deadlines while they cannot. They feel held “ransom” by an assessment report that is not reasonable or workable. This is not inclusion. It is a power struggle that helps no one.
Where Do We Start to Repair?
Move to Adult-to-Adult Relationships
Neurodivergent employees are not children. They do not need “mothers” at work. They are capable of growth. With the right support, they can learn to:
- Manage time blindness
- Build emotional intelligence
- Ask for clarity instead of waiting for perfect instructions
Workplace coaches and occupational psychologists have been delivering this kind of personal development for decades. It works.
Balance Needs, Role, and Resources
There is no one-size-fits-all adjustment. Home working is not a cure-all. Safety-critical roles cannot allow remote work. Large employers can afford more. The key is to assess each case individually. Prevention works better than crisis management. Empower managers and employees to have early conversations about skills like self-organization and emotional regulation. Then escalate to coaching or technology only when needed.
Final Thought: Lowering Standards Is Not Inclusion
To employers who want to do this well, and to neurodivergent employees who still feel stigmatized: the current impasse helps neither side. True neuroinclusion means helping people meet the required standard so they can grow and progress. Lowering the standard is not inclusive. In fact, it is discrimination. Let's move from battle to partnership.
Comment