-
4 minutes, 14 seconds
If you have sent dozens or even a hundred résumés and heard almost nothing back, the problem is usually not your résumé. It is the system you are using. A résumé submitted through an online portal lands in a queue with hundreds of others, often sorted by keywords before a human ever reads it. Adding more applications, however polished, only puts you in a bigger pile.
What cuts through that pile is something a portal cannot provide: a person who knows you and evidence of what you can actually do. The three approaches below build both.
Networking often brings to mind approaching strangers at events or sending awkward LinkedIn messages. A better starting point is the people already in your life.
Research on "weak ties" explains why. Close friends tend to know many of the same people you do. Acquaintances connect you to opportunities and networks you would not otherwise encounter. A professor may have a former student working in your field. Your roommate's mother, a neighbor, or a family friend may know someone worth speaking with.
People you have lost touch with can be just as valuable. In one study, executives sought advice from contacts they had not spoken with in at least three years. During that time, those contacts had moved into new roles and met new people, giving the executives access to information and perspectives beyond their current networks.
The hardest part is figuring out what to write. Here are two examples to work from.
For someone you have not spoken with in a while:
"Hi, it's been a while! I'm thinking about moving into healthcare consulting, and you came to mind because you know the field so well. Would you have 20 minutes to catch up sometime?"
For someone who might know a useful contact:
"I'm looking for marketing roles and haven't had much luck applying online. Do you happen to know anyone in the field who might be willing to talk with me?"
Do not ask for a referral in your opening message. Reconnect first, learn about the person's work, and see whether there is a natural next step.
Résumés frequently describe candidates as strong communicators, strategic thinkers, and creative problem-solvers. AI can make those claims sound more polished, but hiring managers still need to figure out who can actually do the work.
A small work sample provides more convincing evidence. A marketing candidate might suggest improvements to a campaign. A consulting candidate could examine a business challenge and raise thoughtful questions. A data analyst might use public information to create a useful visualization.
Keep the sample brief, and avoid using confidential material. If you know a relevant employee, hiring manager, or recruiter, send that person a link rather than an unsolicited attachment. Sending it to a general company inbox is unlikely to accomplish much.
You might write:
"I've been following what your company is doing in the college market and had a few thoughts about it. I put them into a short, one-page analysis. Would you be open to taking a look?"
This approach works best when the role involves something you can demonstrate. It gives the recipient evidence of your abilities and also something they can easily forward to others.
Many large and midsize employers have formal referral systems. An employee may be able to refer you internally or send you a special application link. Because the referral sometimes must be submitted before the application, ask how the process works before you apply.
A referral does not guarantee an interview, and its value depends partly on how well the employee knows you. The person does not need to have worked closely with you, but should know enough about your background and abilities to explain why you would be a strong candidate.
Rather than hinting and hoping the employee volunteers, make a polite, direct request:
"I'm planning to apply for the role we discussed. Does your company have an employee-referral process? If you'd feel comfortable referring me, I can send you my résumé and a short summary of my background."
This phrasing leaves the person room to decline while making it easy to help if they are comfortable doing so.
After 100 unsuccessful applications, sending another 100 may feel easier than changing your approach. But it leaves you in the same crowded process, where employers cannot tell you apart from everyone else in the queue.
For your next ten opportunities, try at least one way of making yourself more visible. Reconnect with someone who could provide a bridge, create a small piece of work that demonstrates your abilities, or ask about the referral process before applying.
Some people will ignore your message or decline your request. That possibility is exactly why these steps work: most people will not bother trying them.
Comment