Google Sues SerpApi Over Mass Scraping of Search Results

In a high-stakes legal move, Google has filed a federal lawsuit against SerpApi, accusing the web scraping company of stealing search results “at an astonishing scale.” The suit, filed in late 2025, claims SerpApi illegally bypassed Google’s anti-bot technology—SearchGuard—to harvest copyrighted content and resell it to third parties, including AI developers. Users searching for “why is Google suing SerpApi?” or “what is SerpApi scraping?” will find the core issue centers on data theft, digital trespass, and the escalating battle over who owns public-facing web content.

The Alleged Scheme: Billions of Fake Queries

According to Google’s complaint, SerpApi didn’t just scrape the occasional webpage—it allegedly sent hundreds of millions of automated requests to Google Search every day. To avoid detection, the company masked these machine-driven queries as human traffic, effectively impersonating real users. This deception allowed SerpApi to extract structured search results, including snippets, links, and knowledge panels, then package and sell that data via its API. Google claims this not only violates the Copyright Act but also breaches the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), a federal anti-hacking law.

SearchGuard: Google’s Digital Moat

Earlier in 2025, Google rolled out SearchGuard—a sophisticated bot-detection system designed to shield its search results from unauthorized access. The technology was partly a response to rising demand from AI firms hungry for training data. Initially, SearchGuard succeeded in blocking SerpApi entirely. But Google alleges the scraper didn’t retreat; instead, it reverse-engineered workarounds within weeks. Each new evasion technique, Google argues, constitutes a fresh violation of federal law and undermines years of investment in search infrastructure and publisher partnerships.

Why This Case Matters Beyond Google

This lawsuit isn’t happening in a vacuum. Just months earlier, Reddit sued SerpApi (alongside two other scrapers) for allegedly siphoning user-generated content to feed AI models like Perplexity’s. While Google’s filing doesn’t explicitly name AI companies, the subtext is clear: Big Tech is drawing a line in the sand over data hoarding by third-party aggregators. As AI systems increasingly rely on scraped internet content, courts may soon decide whether publicly viewable data is truly “free for the taking”—or if it remains the intellectual property of its hosts.

SerpApi’s Business Model Under Fire

SerpApi markets itself as a developer-friendly tool that delivers Google Search results in clean, machine-readable formats. Its customers include startups, researchers, and AI firms looking to integrate real-time search data without building their own scrapers. But Google contends that convenience doesn’t justify theft. The company argues SerpApi’s entire value proposition hinges on unauthorized access to Google’s proprietary output—content that includes not just algorithms but licensed material from news outlets, e-commerce sites, and other partners who rely on Google for traffic.

Legal Precedents and Future Implications

This case could set a critical precedent for how courts interpret web scraping in the AI era. Previous rulings, like hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, have sometimes sided with scrapers when data is publicly accessible. But Google’s argument hinges on the use of deceptive techniques to bypass technical barriers—a distinction that may sway judges. If Google wins, it could empower other platforms to aggressively enforce digital boundaries, potentially reshaping how AI companies gather training data and how developers access web APIs.

A Broader War Over Data Control

Google’s lawsuit signals a turning point in the tech industry’s data wars. As AI models demand ever-larger datasets, companies are pushing back against unfettered scraping that they say erodes trust, revenue, and control. Google stresses that its search results aren’t just raw data—they’re a curated, copyrighted product built on billions in R&D and publisher collaborations. By taking legal action, Google isn’t just protecting its bottom line; it’s asserting that even “public” digital spaces deserve legal safeguards against industrial-scale extraction.

What’s Next for SerpApi and Scrapers

SerpApi has not yet issued a public response to the lawsuit. But the pressure is mounting: with both Google and Reddit taking legal aim, the company—and others like it—may soon face existential choices. Will they pivot to licensed data partnerships? Retreat from major platforms? Or fight in court for the right to scrape? One thing is certain: as AI’s hunger for data grows, the rules of the open web are being rewritten in real time—and the outcome will affect everything from startup innovation to your next Google search.