ChatGPT Plus GPT-5 Rate Limits Increased After User Backlash
The launch of GPT-5 brought excitement, but also frustration among ChatGPT Plus subscribers who faced strict usage caps. Initially limited to 200 messages per day for the GPT-5 Thinking model, many paying users felt the restriction undermined the value of their subscription. Responding to this feedback, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman confirmed that rate limits for ChatGPT Plus GPT-5 use are being increased, promising a smoother and more flexible experience for those using the advanced reasoning model.
Why ChatGPT Plus GPT-5 Rate Limits Sparked Outrage
ChatGPT Plus members, who pay a monthly fee for early access and premium features, were surprised when GPT-5 came with a lower message cap than expected. The limit of 200 daily messages quickly became a trending topic, with users voicing concerns that it reduced productivity and experimentation. The removal of GPT-4o during GPT-5’s rollout added to the frustration, prompting a wave of criticism directed at OpenAI’s product decisions.
Sam Altman’s Response to the GPT-5 Backlash
In a public statement on X, Altman assured users that the company is “significantly increasing rate limits” for ChatGPT Plus GPT-5 usage. He also revealed that OpenAI is working on a user interface update to clearly display which model is responding to a prompt. While the exact new limits have not been disclosed, Altman emphasized that all model-class limits will soon surpass pre-GPT-5 levels, signaling a commitment to listening to subscriber concerns.
What This Means for ChatGPT Plus Subscribers
For many subscribers, the increase in ChatGPT Plus GPT-5 rate limits is a win for flexibility and value. It suggests that OpenAI is willing to adjust its policies based on real-time feedback, especially when paid users feel shortchanged. With upcoming interface improvements and the promise of higher usage caps, ChatGPT Plus subscribers may find the GPT-5 experience more aligned with expectations—restoring some of the excitement that surrounded the model’s initial launch.
Comment