X has escalated its long-running copyright fight with the music industry, accusing major publishers of abusing the DMCA to pressure the platform into costly licensing deals. The Elon Musk–owned social network says the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) coordinated mass takedown requests to gain leverage. According to the lawsuit, these actions were designed to force X into industrywide agreements rather than allowing individual negotiations. The claims raise fresh questions about how copyright enforcement tools are used on large social platforms. For creators and users, the case could shape how music circulates online. For publishers, it challenges long-standing enforcement strategies. At stake is the balance between copyright protection and platform competition.
Filed on Friday, the antitrust lawsuit alleges that music publishers colluded through the NMPA to undermine fair competition. X argues that instead of negotiating separately, publishers sought to act as a single bloc. This approach, the platform claims, denied it the ability to secure competitive licensing terms. The lawsuit describes a coordinated campaign meant to corner X financially. By framing the issue as antitrust rather than simple copyright enforcement, X is broadening the legal battle. That shift could attract scrutiny beyond the music industry. Regulators and courts may now examine how collective licensing efforts affect digital markets.
Central to X’s complaint is the claim that DMCA takedown notices were “weaponized” starting in 2021. The platform says it received thousands of notices every week tied to allegedly infringing posts. According to X, the volume and timing of these requests were intended to apply pressure, not just protect copyrights. The lawsuit argues that such tactics disrupted normal platform operations. It also suggests the strategy was meant to make licensing appear unavoidable. If proven, the claims could reshape how mass takedowns are viewed legally. DMCA tools, designed for rights protection, may face tighter scrutiny.
X’s copyright troubles have been widely documented since Elon Musk acquired the platform. High-profile piracy incidents, including repeated uploads of full-length movies, drew industry attention in 2023. Publishers argue that lax enforcement encouraged widespread infringement. X, however, says it has been unfairly targeted compared to other platforms. The company maintains that it responds to valid takedown requests. This dispute highlights the broader challenge of moderating massive volumes of user-generated content. It also underscores tensions between free expression and copyright control. Those tensions are now playing out in court.
The lawsuit adds another chapter to a case that began when the NMPA sued X for $250 million in 2023 over more than 1,700 songs. Parts of that case survived judicial review in 2024, keeping pressure on the platform. Notably, a November 2025 filing indicated that both sides had made substantial progress toward settlement. This new action suggests negotiations may have stalled. X is now seeking monetary damages and a court order blocking collective licensing pressure. The outcome could redefine negotiations between platforms and rights holders. It may also influence how future copyright disputes are handled.
If X succeeds, the ruling could limit how trade groups coordinate enforcement efforts. Platforms might gain more flexibility in negotiating licenses individually. Publishers, on the other hand, warn that weakening collective action could undermine copyright protection. The case arrives as lawmakers debate updates to digital copyright laws. Industry observers see it as a bellwether for future disputes. For users, the decision could affect what content stays online. For the tech and music industries alike, the stakes are unusually high.
𝗦𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁, 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀.
From jobs and gigs to communities, events, and real conversations — we bring people and ideas together in one simple, meaningful space.

Comment