What is Grokipedia and why is it controversial?

Grokipedia is the new online encyclopedia from Elon Musk’s xAI, designed as a Wikipedia alternative. Promoted as “less woke and less biased,” it claims to provide factual, AI-verified content. However, many users are raising alarms: Grokipedia is racist, transphobic, and loves Elon Musk, reflecting a clear bias in its coverage of certain topics. The platform’s 885,000+ entries are a mix of cloned Wikipedia content and articles heavily influenced by Musk’s worldview.

How does Grokipedia show bias?

Many articles on Grokipedia shift tone when addressing controversial topics. While neutral information is often copied from Wikipedia, entries challenging Musk’s beliefs veer into conspiracy theories, right-wing talking points, and unfounded claims. Topics like vaccines, social issues, and gender identity are frequently distorted. At the same time, Musk and his ventures are presented positively, reinforcing the notion that Grokipedia is racist, transphobic, and loves Elon Musk.

Is Grokipedia fact-checked?

Grokipedia claims that its AI chatbot, Grok, fact-checks all entries. Yet, it’s unclear how rigorous this process is, especially when the platform includes misinformation and overt biases. Experts warn that relying on Grokipedia for research or news could mislead readers, highlighting concerns over accuracy, transparency, and editorial integrity.

Should users trust Grokipedia?

With its apparent ideological slant, Grokipedia is not a neutral resource. Researchers, students, and casual readers should approach it with caution. The platform’s mix of copied content, selective bias, and Musk-centric narratives makes it clear why many say Grokipedia is racist, transphobic, and loves Elon Musk. Until xAI implements stricter fact-checking and editorial standards, skepticism is warranted.