Managing the now and the next has quietly become leadership’s hardest job today. Leaders are asking how to hit targets now while preparing teams for an uncertain future shaped by AI, shifting skills, and changing employee expectations. In most organizations, performance still looks strong on the surface. Work is delivered, systems run, and efficiency metrics are met. Yet beneath that stability is growing tension. The future of work is arriving faster than most organizations are designed to absorb.
Why Organizations Excel at Managing the Now
Most organizations are built to manage the present with precision. Quarterly goals, operational efficiency, and performance tracking dominate leadership attention. These systems reward consistency, predictability, and execution. By traditional standards, they work. Productivity hasn’t collapsed, and results continue to be delivered. The danger is not failure—it’s complacency. Managing the now has become so refined that it leaves little room for what comes next.
The Growing Leadership Gap Between Now and Next
The next looks very different from the present. Skills are evolving faster than job titles, AI adoption is accelerating faster than confidence, and workers are rethinking how much work should demand of their lives. This creates a widening gap between short-term performance and long-term readiness. Leaders see the future approaching, but most organizations remain structurally focused on immediate output. Execution is rewarded, while capability-building is deferred. Over time, that imbalance compounds risk.
Workforce Performance Without Slack Is a Warning Sign
Recent workforce data makes this tension visible. ManpowerGroup’s 2026 Global Talent Barometer shows nearly nine in ten workers feel confident in their ability to do their jobs today. On paper, this looks like resilience. But confidence in using new technologies, including AI, is falling. People trust their own skills more than the systems meant to prepare them for the future. This is what managing the now without slack looks like: extracting value from existing capability while the conditions that sustain it quietly erode.
Skills Are Changing Faster Than Confidence Can Keep Up
The next horizon exposes deeper fragility. As AI becomes embedded into daily work, most employees report receiving little recent training or development. Confidence in career progression lags far behind confidence in current performance. This uncertainty fuels caution rather than ambition. Workers want to grow, but not blindly. They are weighing risk carefully in an environment where future pathways feel unclear.
Job Hugging Signals Strategic Caution, Not Complacency
This explains the rise of “job hugging.” Globally, many workers expect to stay in their roles while simultaneously applying elsewhere. This is not contradiction—it’s strategy. Employees are managing risk the same way organizations do. They preserve stability while keeping options open. The behavior reflects uncertainty about whether employers will invest in future-ready skills. Growth is still desired, but only with support.
Why This Is a Leadership Problem, Not a Workforce One
It’s easy to misread this moment as resistance to change. The data suggests the opposite. Workers are already using AI, valuing skills over credentials, and seeking development. What they are opting out of is unmanaged uncertainty. Leaders face the same tension. Both sides want stability and growth. The difference is that leaders control the systems that make growth possible without forcing exit.
Designing Organizations for the Now and the Next
Managing the now and the next requires new leadership muscles. It means creating space for learning, accepting short-term inefficiency, and investing before results are guaranteed. Organizations that thrive won’t choose between horizons—they’ll design for both. Learning becomes infrastructure, internal mobility replaces exit, and leaders are measured not just by results delivered, but by capability built. The future of work will be shaped by those who can hold both horizons at once—and act on both with intent.
Comment